Abstract

Introduction

Background

   GreenRevolution

   Gujarat, India

   SatelliteImagery

 

Part I-Vegetation Derivation

Methods

Results/Discussion

Conclusions

 

Part II-Land Cover Change

    Dams

    Irrigation

    Desertification

Conclusions

 

Final Thoughts

Acknowledgements

Works Cited 

List of Figures and Appendix

 

Figure 21

 

Histograms of NDVI values

for the forested study area pictured in Figure 20

 

Histogram of NDVI Values 1972

NDVI

Histogram of NDVI Values 1976

NDVI

Histogram of NDVI Values 1980

NDVI

 

The number of pixels for each value of NDVI is plotted in the histograms above. The red line is at 0.35, the cutoff assigned to forests using a threshold method. The areas with NDVI values above 0.35 are shown in Figures 17-19. The distribution is similar from year to year for most of the histogram below values of approximately 0.2. However, the overall distribution of the data between 0.2 and 0.7 shifts slightly from year to year. One possibility is that these shifts are caused by small errors in the process of radiometric alignment. However, because the overall distribution of the data is not equally shifted across vegetation abundance levels, alignment problems are less likely than the possibility that actual changes in vegetation cover occurred.

Most importantly, the threshold method can reflect changes in the overall distribution of vegetation abundance rather than the actual changes in forest cover.

Back to Index

For more information please contact Laurel_Firestone@yahoo.com