Survey Distribution

Survey | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6-7 | Q8 | Q9 |Q10 | Q11 | Q12 | Q13 | Q14Q15 | Q16 | Q17 | Q18 | Q19 | Q20 | Q21 | Q22 | Q23-24 | Q25 | Q26-27 | Q28 | Q29 | Q30
In the 7,697 member ANLA database, provided to me by Craig Regelbrugge at ANLA, there were 491 member email addresses. After piloting my survey on 30 of those members (and one non-member), and excluding those members outside of the continental United States, I was left with 427 ANLA member email addreses to which I could send my survey.  77 individuals responded to my survey.

86/427 (20%) of the emails were returned to be due to mailing error, leaving 341 ANLA members with email who received my survey. In writing my survey (see Methods), I broke the country into six regions, according to the plants which were generally commonly invasive within those regions (see Endnotes i-iv for states included in each region and the plants considered invasive). According to this breakdown, 173 nurseries in the Northeast received surveys, 62 in the Southeast, 13 in Florida, 20 in the Prairie, 18 in the Southwest, 55 in the west.

96 ANLA members and 8 non-ANLA members replied to my survey. One non-member received the email because it was forwarded to them by a member, the other 7 directly received the survey because they were the contact for a nursery association included in the ANLA database, but not a member themselves. Of the 103 who replied to me, only 77 filled out the survey. The remaining 27 replied to tell me that they could not fill out the survey because they were not a nursery or landscaper, but a supplier, journalist, or nursery association. I refer to the 77 who completed my survey as my “respondents”.

The response rates varied by region and by medium. I gave my respondents the option of replying electronically and by mail (by printing out the survey and filling it out by hand). 45/77 (58%) chose to reply by mail, 32/77 (42%) chose to reply by email. The higher proportion who chose to reply by hand, in addition to the low proportion of ANLA members who actually had working email (341/7697, 4.4%), indicates that the nursery industry is probably not highly connected to the internet. The very small representation of members included in my survey (69/7697, 0.9%), however, does not invalidate my findings – it just indicates that my findings are descriptively valuable, not statistically significant.

76/341 (22%) of the individuals who received the survey directly from me replied to it. By region, my response rate was 42/173 (24%) in the Northeast, 15/62 (24%) in the Southeast, 4/13 (31%) in Florida, 5/20 (25%) in the Prairie, 3/18 (17%) in the Southwest, and 7/55 (13%) in the West.

Total Responses to Email Survey

Region

Sent

Total Received

Post Responses

Email Responses

Mail Error

Not nursery / Replied w/o responding

Not ANLA

Total Responses

Northeast[i]

212

173

28*

15

39

8

5

43*

Southeast[ii]

81

62

8

7

19

7

2

15

Florida[iii]

14

13

2

2†

1

1

0

4

Prairie[iv]

26

20

2

3

6

2

0

5

Southwest[v]

21

18

2

1

3

3

0

3

West[vi]

73

55

3

4

18

5

1

7

Unidentifiable

 

 

 

 

 

1

0

0

Total

427

341

44

32

86

27

8

77*

*indicates that one respondent received the survey as a forward

†indicates that one respondent was not a nursery but a nursery supplier

Because my initial email on January 26, 2000 only gathered 54 responses by February 23, I sent out a second email on March 8, 2000. The two following tables illustrate the breakdown for those two mailings.                                                      

First email, sent January 26, 2000         (Due February 11, 2000; came in up to February 23)

Total Completed Responses to first mailing: 54                                                                                                           

Region

Sent

Post Responses

Email Responses

Not nursery / Replied w/o responding

Not ANLA

Northeast[i]

212

22*

9

5

4

Southeast[ii]

81

4

7

1

1

Florida[iii]

14

2

2†

1

0

Prairie[iv]

26

1

2

0

0

Southwest[v]

21

1

1

0

0

West[vi]

73

2

1

4

0

Unidentifiable

 

 

 

1

 

Total

427

32*

22†

12

5

Total Responses

54*†

 

 

 

Second email, sent March 8, 2000 (Due March 22,2000, came in up to April 10, 2000)

Region

Sent

Post Responses

Email Responses

Not nursery / Replied w/o responding

Not ANLA

Northeast[i]

147

6

6

3

1

Southeast[ii]

61

4

0

6

1

Florida[iii]

9

0

0

0

0

Prairie[iv]

17

1

1

2

0

Southwest[v]

16

1

0

3

0

West[vi]

51

1

3

1

1

Total

301

12

10

15

3

Total Responses

23

 

 

 

Of the original 427 email addresses that I sent surveys to on Januray 26, 301 did not reply to me, did not have a mail error, or replied to indicate that they were a nursery association.
I sent these 301 ANLA members another email survey to and asked for more responses, I received 23. I included nursery associations in hopes that they might forward the survey onto their members; none did.

 

 

Survey | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6-7 | Q8 | Q9 |Q10 | Q11 | Q12 | Q13 | Q14Q15 | Q16 | Q17 | Q18 | Q19 | Q20 | Q21 | Q22 | Q23-24 | Q25 | Q26-27 | Q28 | Q29 | Q30

IPlants: Invasive Plants and the Nursery Industry | Meredith Hall | Center for Environmental Studies|Brown University