Back to the home page

 

Results

This page contains the maps of the results of the ranking system. Two trials were run, with different sets of priorities. The point values that were assigned to each data layer are available.

These maps are available as an interactive map. These maps may take a long time to download so please be patient. (Internet Explorer 5.0 or Netscape 4.7 only, this feature is not compatible with Netscape 6)
Click here to view the map on a small monitor

Click here to view the map on a large monitor

(Metadata for this map)

Detailed instructions on how to use these maps are available here. (RIDEM)
A shorter list of tools on the maps is available here. (RIDEM)

The values from the web survey are derived from the results of the Charlestown Openspace Prioritization Project. The values from the planning and conservation commissions were derived through discussion with the commissions during planing workshops. More information about this process is available on this site.

These maps show areas that are currently vacant, and could potentially have houses built on them according to the buildout analysis. The parcels that are important to protect in dark red, and areas that are less important in blue. The darker the red, the more important it is to protect the parcel. To see how this scoring system is created, go to the methodology section.

There is very little difference between the results from the planning and conservation commissions' and the web survey's scoring systems. A map of the differences between scoring is below. This map shows parcels that score higher with the web survey's scoring system in red and parcels that are the same in green. The parcels that score higher according to the conservation commission and planning commission's scoring system are in blue. This map does not show the amount of difference in the actual scores, but this difference was not very great for any of the parcels. The difference was no more than 16% on any given parcel. More discussion about the evaluated the consequences of the differences is in the potential impacts section.

These maps should be used to evaluate the scoring systems. If a policy is created using one of these scoring systems, the parcels that are dark red will tend to be protected before parcels that are blue. Of course, this will happen only if there are several parcels that could be bought at any given time and the town has to decide between potential purchases.

These maps also help identify parcels that should proactively be pursued to be protected as openspace. The parcels that score high, should be investigated individually to determine if they can be protected.

Finally, these maps should help evaluate the scoring systems themselves. The parcels that score high should have characteristics that are compatible with the town's goals. If not, there is a flaw in the scoring system. This flaw should be fixed before the scoring system is incorporated in the openspace plan.

An in-depth discussion of evaluating the point systems is in the potential impacts section.

Results from Web Survey

Click on map to enlarge


Results from Commission Survey

Click on map to enlarge


Difference in Results

Click on map to enlarge

6.01 Matthew Amengual