Protected Cultural Resources

click map to enlarge large file (~100k)
|
This
table shows the number of parcels identified as culturally significant
in this inventory that are protected from development by state,
local, or private organizations. Data from the Village Inventory
is limited to Peace Dale, Wakefield, and Kingston. |
|
Polygons |
% |
Acres |
% |
| Protected |
139 |
5.0 |
6171.2 |
41.2 |
| Unprotected |
2646 |
95.0 |
8807.9 |
58.8 |
| Total |
2785 |
100.0 |
14979.1 |
100.0 |
The disparity between
protected parcels and protected acres is interesting. It could be
the result of previous bias toward protecting large, undeveloped
parcels in systems that prioritize natural resources and recreational
use of open space. While it is not always necessary to purchase
parcels in order to protect their cultural value, this analysis
shows the increase in the overall number of parcels implicated in
a cultural inventory. This trend is likely to continue with completion
of the Inventory with data from the eight other districts in the
Village Inventory.
In addition, much of
the protected open space in South Kingstown is located in rural
areas of town primarily the farms south of Route 1 and the
Great Swamp. Since protection of village character may not involve
acquiring parcels (especially those that are already built out),
other management options will need to be explored.
Co-occurring Cultural
Designation
click
map to enlarge large file (~100k)
|
The primary purpose
of this map is to locate parcels that have been identified
as culturally significant in multiple studies. There are several
problems with this analysis. Cultural studies often build
on one another. For example, in both the Scenic Byways inventory
and the Landscape Inventory, one of the selection criteria
was the presence of designated National Register sites. In
this study, National Register properties are also coded as
culturally significant. Thus, the results of cultural inventories
tend to reinforce one another.
The second main
problem is that only one of these studies is based on local
knowledge while the rest are expert derived. If there is a
significant difference
|
in the priorities of
experts and citizens, a ranking system such as this that prioritizes
cultural resources based on frequency would tend to favor expert
identified resources. In the case of South Kingstown, this appears
unlikely as there is significant overlap between the Village
Inventory and the other data sources.
Finally, there is a significant
difference between the cultural score (number of cultural designations)
in parcels protected as open space and unprotected parcels. An average
parcel in town has .34 cultural designations, while a parcel protected
as open space scores .63. This is to be expected since open space
acquisition strategies often give weight to cultural resources.
The average score of culturally significant parcels alone is 1.42.
While all scores will change when the Village Inventory coding
is complete, this shows the tendency for cultural resources to occur
in protected open space even under the current acquisition regime.
A detailed analysis of the tendency for all resources to co-occur
on individual parcels is presented in Charlestown
at Buildout.
|