Working Toward a Real Watershed Approach in Rhode Island

This website is currently in draft form and under development. (as of May 10, 2001)

Quick Reference
Site Map
Take the Action Plan Survey
Highest ranking topics
Do's and Don'ts in a Web Survey
Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council
A few nice links...
RI DEM Watersheds Partnership
EPA Surf Your Watershed
Clean Water Act Section 319
Action Plan Survey
Analysis: Points and Prorating

For some analyses, each answer of Highest through Lowest and Don't Know received a point-based score which was then prorated to transform it into a percentage.

Highest 100
High 80
Medium 60
Low 40
Lowest 20
Don't Know 0
Blank blank

Consider the following example:

Respondent Water Quality Drinking Water Biodiversity Growth Planning Flood Protection
#1

Highest

High

Medium Low Lowest
100 80 60 40 20
#2 High High High Medium Medium
80 80 80 60 40
#3 Medium Don't Know Medium High Don't Know
60 0 60 80 0
Average 80 53.3 66.7 60

20

Rank 1 4 2 3 5

Each respondent has a different scheme of prioritization. #1 uses the entire spread of points, #2 ranks everything on the high side, #3 leaves some topics blank. In a straight averaging situation, the topics marked "Don't Know" are penalized and the topics with the more inflated ranking are given an unfair advantage.

By prorating the scores, however, and turning each point value into a percentage of the total points allotted, we can more accurately reflect the respondents relative priorities.

Example Water Quality Drinking Water Biodiversity Growth Planning Flood Protection Total Points
#1

Highest

High

Medium Low Lowest  
100 80 60 40 20

300

33% 27% 20% 13% 7%  
#2 High High High Medium Medium  
80 80 80 60 60 360
22% 22% 22% 16% 16%  
#3 Medium Don't Know Medium High Don't Know  
60 0 60 80 0 200
30% 30% 40%    
Average 28% 24.5% 24% 23% 12%  
Rank 1 2 3 4 5  

As you can see in this example, the rating of "High" in Respondent #1's scheme is rewarded with a prorated score of 27% whereas the rating of "High" in Respondent #2's scheme takes into consideration "score inflation" and returns a pro-rated score of 22%. Likewise, in #3's scheme, the rating of "High" makes up a total 40% of all the points awarded.

For some other methods of analysis, see Sensitivity.

Rationale
What is the Action Plan?
Purpose
Why go online?
Limitations
Format
Demographic questions
Prioritization scheme
Multiple layers
Distribution
Stakeholders contacted
Advertisement and publicity
Analysis
Points and Pro-rating
Sensitivity