|
Respondents who claim high levels of involvement
are likely to be a better position to influence policy
changes and implement programs associated with the watershed.
DEM could give more weight to the high priority topics
and issues of this population and in so doing have a
better chance of seeing the projects completed with
investment and involvement from the watershed community.
Along those same lines, priorities from lesser-involved
respondents could help us to see what might not
be represented at the usual meetings and agendas.
|
Click to enlarge
|
| 1. All respondents favor Water
Quality and Contaminated Sites in their top
4 |
| 2. Very involved and somewhat
involved respondents have similar priorities
(Water Quality, Public Health, Biodiversity,
Contaminated Sites, Growth Planning) and these
are similar to the aggregate ranking. |
| 3. Uninvolved respondents favor
Equity and Dams above more involved respondents
and disregard Growth Planning almost entirely |
|
(N=60)
|
|
