conclusions : : : looking at crime changes by individual house

As the graphs indicate, it is critical to examine crime trends by individual house - looking at crime by neighborhood or case study area gives an inaccurate sense of how crime changes with renovation. The reason I measured crime within a "control" - the neighborhood - is to account for changes in crime that may have come as a result of natural increase or decrease, or a neighborhood-wide effort to decrease crime that does not have to do with renovation. In short, I did not want to give "credit" to renovated buildings for decreasing crime when they did not deserve it.

But there is something else working here, which is the crime fluctuation on those individual houses. According to the graphs, the Tanner Block and Operation Hope Renewed houses experienced dramatic increase in crime after renovation. But this is not necessarily a function of negative quality of life - it is necessary to examine the types of crime reports that these houses are experiencing more of. An increase of nuisance crime in the Tanner Block, for example, might in fact be a positive indicator of quality of life. The new residents of the Tanner Block houses might be more vigilant about their homes now that they are renovated, and therefore more likely to call the police than when the house was vacant.

It is critical for the property owners, the non-profit organizations, and RI Housing to look at each individual property and the crime history at that house. Let's take one house as an example of this process:

EXAMPLE 1

1 Tanner St.

Before:

Description Street Name Street Number Date Time
ARTICLE FOUND TANNER 1 3/20/1996 12:49:00 PM
LARCENY TANNER 1 5/23/1997 1:51:00 PM

After:

Description Street Name Street Number Date Time
DIST. SUPPRESSED TANNER 1 8/8/1999 4:39:00 PM
Mal. Mischief TANNER 1 2/15/1999 2:51:00 AM
Lost/Stolen Plt TANNER 1 7/2/1998 6:24:00 AM
MV Theft/Auto TANNER 1 7/25/1998 9:00:00 PM
Mal. Mischief TANNER 1 8/7/1998 5:50:00 PM
MV Theft/Auto TANNER 1 8/20/1998 10:07:00 AM
Mal. Mischief TANNER 1 6/29/1999 10:26:00 PM
Warrant Arrest TANNER 1 12/29/1998 7:00:00 AM
Warrant Arrest TANNER 1 1/22/1999 6:50:00 AM
Warrant Arrest TANNER 1 1/14/1999 7:30:00 AM

As you can see from 1 Tanner St., the increase of crimes occured mostly during the Summer of 1998 and the end of 1998 and beginning of 1999. Further research about the tenants of that house might uncover why crime increased after renovation.

 

Let's look at another example, from the West End project:

72 Bridgham

Before:

Description Street Name Street Number Date Time
VEHICLE RECOVERED BRIDGHAM 72 11/3/1988  
ARSON BRIDGHAM 72 5/15/1989 3:54:00

After:

Description Street Name Street Number Date Time
Larceny BRIDGHAM 72 3/3/1999 3:20:00 AM
Threatening BRIDGHAM 72 7/17/1998 2:08:00 AM
L/S PLATE(S) BRIDGHAM 72 5/20/1999 2:05:00 PM
MV Theft/Truck BRIDGHAM 72 8/13/2000 10:10:00 PM
MALICIOUS DAMAGE BRIDGHAM 72 12/18/1999 5:43:00 PM
Mal. Mischief BRIDGHAM 72 3/20/1998 6:37:00 PM
Lost/Stolen Plt BRIDGHAM 72 2/24/1998 4:10:00 AM
1ST DEG. SEX. ASSLT. BRIDGHAM 72 3/15/1998 2:20:00 PM

Looking at the narrative of what happened (as well as when the crime occured) is necessary to figure out why some properties have so many more reports written after renovation.-

 

christine coletta
center for environmental studies, brown university
about this project
last updated 2/6/03