|
The following maps relate to the Case
Study in the neighborhood of Smith Hill. They are displayed
in chronological order, to show the variation from week to week.
Click on any one map to enlarge it.
Methodology
Garbage Scores
Recycling Scores
Rat Presence and Garbage
Rat Presence and Recycling
For further discussion of the case study
results, click here.
|
|
 |
|
|
Providence neighborhoods.
Smith Hill, the case study neighborhood, is highlighted.
|
Smith Hill parcel map. Blue and green demarcate
areas included in the weekly assessment.
Blue parcels received flyers.
|
|
|
|
Results Maps: Garbage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28
|
March
7
|
March 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 21
|
April 4
|
April 11
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 18
|
Rat Activity
|
Back to top
|
|
Scoring: A-C (A=2 recycling bins
in use, B=1 bin, C=none)
In order to simplify calculations of the recycling data, recycling
scores A-C were changed to 1-3, as seen in the Results. |
|
|
|
|
|
February 28
|
March 7
|
March 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 21
|
April 4
|
April 11
|
|
|
|
|
April 18
|
|
Back to top
Results Maps: Rats
and Garbage Scores |
These maps show the relationship between rat presence and
garbage management. A rat sighting at some point during
the assessment is shown with a black dot.
|
|
|
|
Scoring: 1-5
(1=best, 5=worst)
|
March 14
|
March 21
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 4
|
April 11
|
April 18
|
Back to top
Results Maps: Rats
and Recycle Scores |
These maps show the relationship between rat presence and
recycling participation.
The connection is less direct than that between rats and
garbage. However, it is interesting to note the high presence
of rats where no recycling is occuring.
|
|
|
|
Scoring: A-C
(A=best, C=worst)
|
March 14
|
March 21
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 4
|
April 11
|
April 18
|
Back to top
|
|
