|
Findings: Materials: Comprehensibility
The handout given to residents at
the September 25th meeting is the most important document to consider,
since it was given to the most people and sums up many of the messages
that HEALTH repeated throughout the contamination. The handout is
fairly comprehensible; it is an advisory, and does not require
a great deal of background knowledge to understand it. Difficult
concepts, such as measurements in parts per billion, are included,
but aided by a relevant analogy.
The most incomprehensible part of
this document deals with the concept of "federal risk levels.

This section is seemingly contradictory on a first reading,
and requires a fairly deep understanding of what risk levels
are. Understanding how different groups can have different risk
levels also asks for further background knowledge. When explored
in focus groups, the concept of these risks levels was also problematic.
Participants took from this passage the idea of conflicting standards,
and wondered why the state did not agree with the federal government
standards. Though the state standards were ultimately stricter than
the federal standards, the conflict resulted in a general lack of
trust in all the standards. The idea that federal guidance can be
"inconsistent" does not do much for inspiring trust
in officials.
Another major problem
with the document is that of internal consistency. The goal
of the text seems to swing between advising concern and
advising calm.
The handout seems
to say that:
| Calm |
Concern |
|
-the
real quantity is of MTBE is very small
-exposures
don't exceed federal risk levels
-exposures
are still very low
|
-but
MTBE levels are still unacceptable
-but
don't use the water anyway for drinking, cooking, etc.
-but
there are three different routes of exposure and not all are
covered by the advisory guidelines
|
These conflicts make it more difficult
to gather the overall message from this advisory.
The main problem with the advisory
is its lack of attention to resident concerns. Approximately
the same amount of space is devoted to resident health concerns
as to advising residents to "protect their water supply from
contamination" in the future. Not addressing the concerns of
the residents in an open manner was not an effective communication
strategy, as was shown by the ES
126 study.
|
"MTBE levels
in Pascoag water (as high as 600 ppb) exceed the RI Department of
Health (HEALTH) maximum of 40 ppb. Even at this high level, the
contamination amounts to only 1 oz of MTBE in a typical, backyard
swimming pool (24ft diameter, 4ft deep)."
(www..healthri.org/
environment/
risk/mtbe/factsheet.htm)
That
would be a very strange announcement, because on the one hand theyre
saying dont drink the water, and then on the other hand, theyre
just basically saying we dont agree with the federal guidelines.
--focus group participant
|