|
Brownfield contamination represents a public health risk and a serious obstacle to successful redevleopment. There are multiple routes in which contamination can affect public health, as well as multiple chemicals that may be found on site. In this page, we describe the major routes of exposure to soil contamination and we profile several significant possible contaminants. The remediation process is also described to illustrate the general process a developer would take to successfully identify and eliminate contamination.
Routes of Exposure | Chemical Profiles | Remediation | References
________________________________________________________________
Routes of Exposure
Soil contamination can be expected to linger for some period of time, with some chemicals, such as lead, being nearly immobile, irrespective of groundwater flow. As such, our study on the Jewelry District's contamination focused on soil contaminants. We would expect most people to come into contact with these contaminants through contact with the soil directly, resulting in either ingestion (if, say, hands are not washed before consuming food) or transdermal exposure. Inhalation is also possible if soil particles are extremely fine and blown into the air or if a person smokes cigarettes after handling soil.
Many pollutants associated with industrial use are volatile and, as such, can accumulate in the air inside buildings on contaminated sites. With the exception of some case studies, we did not look at volatile contaminants, because they do not last in the soil nearly as long. Nevertheless, the health risks associated with inhalation of vapors can be quite significant.
________________________________________________________________
Chemical Profiles
Arsenic | Lead | PAH | TPH | Cadmium | Chromium | Mercury
Arsenic
Arsenic and its compounds are especially toxic. Acute poisoning, following exposure to a high dose, causes multiple organ system failures and usually results in death. Arsenic occurs naturally in the earth's crust and is quite ubiquitous in Rhode Island , where, owing to frequent findings of contamination in excess of RIDEM's 1.7 ppm limit, the standard has recently been raised to 7.0 ppm for both residential and commercial uses (RIDEM 2006). This probably will not cause significant harm to the public; chronic arsenic poisoning usually results from drinking water with high levels of arsenic for a long period of time. There is definitely the possibility of arsenic leaching into groundwater-derived drinking water, so using groundwater from a contaminated site is not recommended (EPA). The treatment of water is out of the scope of this project, but it is worth mentioning that the standard for arsenic in drinking water continues to be a contentious issue.
Chronic effects of arsenic include the formation of hard patches on the skin, particularly on the hands and feet. Blackfoot disease, a type of gangrene, is one of the most identifiable characteristics of arsenic poisoning. Arsenic is a carcinogen and can cause skin, lung, kidney and bladder cancers. Liver injuries, such as jaundice and cirrhosis, also can result from long-term exposure.
With an industrial legacy in the Jewelry District, we can expect to find soil contamination in excess of the natural deposits. Arsenic has long been used as a wood preservative, but it has also been used in making paints, dyes, soap, semi-conductors, copper smelting and coal mining (EPA). Indeed, our review of the Sanborn maps and SIC data would predict arsenic to be found on many properties, including those involved in lumber storage, carpentry, coal power plants, metal manufacturing and laundry operations.
Sampling on the Dynamo House property showed arsenic to be concentrated at 8-16 ppm in soil. As these levels exceed the new DEM standards, reporting would be required. This does not necessarily need to be remediated; a 2001 finding of arsenic in excess of 24 ppm on the Main Green of Brown University did not involve any remediation (Brown). Remediation could be achieved by removing the top two inches of soil and replacing with new fill ( Baltimore Sun).
Lead
Few chemicals are as notorious as lead. A potent neurotoxin, lead accumulates in bones and soft tissues. Children are thought to be especially vulnerable to the toxic effects of lead, as lead can disrupt the development of the nervous system. Lowered IQ, anemia, kidney and reproductive problems and many other symptoms can result from lead poisoning; seizures and death may result from extreme exposures (ATSDR).
Lead does not generally appear naturally in soils, but its past widespread use in paints and gasoline have caused lead to be somewhat ubiquitous in the urban environment. Lead is a persistent pollutant; it does not readily move about once deposited in soil, so sites historically associated with lead will likely still have high levels of lead contamination ( Minnesota ).
Industries associated with lead in the Jewelry District include coal power plants and electricity storage, miscellaneous metal work and plating, jewelry manufacturing, paints, automobile repair garages and gasoline stations.

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH's)

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) consist of fused aromatic rings (benzene derivatives). They do not contain any heteroatoms (atoms outside of hydrogen and carbon). Normally they do not exist in appreciable amounts in the environment. Their presence in the environment is, therefore, an indication of pollution, either from a point source or from atmospheric deposition. Because PAHs are not very soluble in water, they tend to persist in the environment for long periods of time.
PAHs form as a result of the incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels. These can include wood, diesel and coal. Different types result from different forms of combustion; we would find different PAHs linked to coal and gasoline, the primary sources of PAHs in the Jewelry District. As they are also a component of tar, PAHs will be found in high amounts near roads, such as the old I-195 corridor.
Toxicity of PAHs varies widely; isomers containing the same number of atoms may be harmless or deadly. One PAH, benzopyrene, found in cigarette smoke, is notable for being the first chemical determined to be carcinogenic; it can also occur in coal tar. With little information on the species of PAHs found in the Jewelry District, we cannot make any determination about risk.
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) describes a large family of hundreds of chemical compounds from crude oil and its petroleum derivatives. It is not practical to measure each individually, but a composite measure of the total amount of TPH at a site can be made. Among the chemicals classifiable as TPH are toluene, benzene, PAHs and hexanes. Some chemicals can easily be broken down by microorganisms or carried away by water, while others will be more persistent in the environment. Underground gasoline storage tanks are a major source of TPH and we could expect a majority of the TPH contamination in the Jewelry District to come from these tanks (ASTDR 1999: 60). Oil spills account for another source and can explain some of the contamination associated with highways (ASTDR 1999: 49).
With increased numbers of carbons, TPH compounds become less soluble and are, therefore, more likely to be found on sites. Despite the large numbers of these compounds, only a few have been fully screened for toxicity (ASTDR 1999: 16). Benzene is a known carcinogen; others, like xylene, can cause irritation if inhaled.

Cadmium
Cadmium-containing ores are rare. Even when found, they occur only in small quantities. Most cadmium mineral is in the form CdS; this is nearly always associated with zinc and, as a result, most cadmium is produced as a by-product of zinc mining, smelting and refining. To a lesser degree, cadmium may be associated with lead and copper (EPA). Cadmium was not widely-used in American industries until after World War I. Today about 75% of the cadmium produced is used to make nickel-cadmium batteries (ATSDR). Cadmium can be used as a catalyst in electroplating metals, in manufacturing pigments and in plastics. Cadmium may also enter the environment through the combustion of fossil fuels, coal and oil in particular (EPA). Cigarette smoke contains large amounts of cadmium.
Cadmium is a potent toxicant. In occupational settings, the primary route of exposure is inhalation. Pneumonitis, edema and death may result. Cadmium is an environmental toxicant of concern; because it tends to bio-accumulate, people can experience dietary exposures. Another source of exposure is drinking water. This source seems to be associated with proteinuria, a sign of renal damage (EPA). Cadmium is considered by the EPA to be a probable carcinogen, causing lung cancer.
We can expect to find cadmium in the Jewelry District. It enters into the soil from atmospheric deposition and by the dumping of toxic wastes.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Cadmium . Draft for Public Comment. Public Health Service , U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta , GA. 1997.
Chromium
Chromium occurs in the environment in different forms. Different species of chromium have different uses and chemical profiles. Chromium (III) occurs naturally in the environment and is an essential nutrient. Chromium (VI) and chromium (0) are generally produced as a result of industrial processes. Chromium (0), or metallic chromium, is used in the production of steel. It generally will enter soils and become immobilized (ATSDR).
Metallic chromium is used for making steel and other alloys. Chromium(VI) and chromium(III) are used in making chrome plating, dyes and pigments, tanning leather, and preserving wood (ATSDR). In particular, chromium(III) makes the characteristic yellow and green pigments associated with chromium. Chromium contamination in soil can be quite extensive; many properties are classified as Superfund sites as a result. A number of these are found in industrial areas; New Jersey in particular has a number of chromium Superfund sites (CQS).
While metallic chromium and chromium(III) are fairly benign, with CrIII even being required for biologic functioning, hexavalent chromium is extremely toxic. It is a potent carcinogen, causing lung cancer and eye damage (Wikipedia). Because even low doses of chromium can cause harmful effects, industrial groups are now being pressured to replace chromium with other chemicals (EPA). Recent research at Brown University shows that vitamin C can interact with cells exposed to CrVI to cause up to ten to fifteen times more chromosomal breaks (Brown).
In the Jewelry District, chromium pollution is associated with its use in electroplating metals and the manufacturing of paints, heavy machinery and rubber. It is highly likely that chromium exists in the soils, as it does not readily dissolve into groundwater.
Mercury
Mercury has quite a storied history. It has been known to humans for millennia and its uses have often led to unintended health problems. The emperor of China , Qin Shi Huang Di died after taking mercury pills intended to give him eternal life; many ancient Greeks and Romans became sick after using the chemical for medical and cosmetic uses (Wikipedia). The Mad Hatter of Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland exemplified the effects of occupational exposure to mercury.
Widely-used in industry, mercury continues to be used to make a number of medical devices, such as thermometers, dental fillings and preservatives for vaccines. It also occurs as a result of mining practices, the production of chlorine, gold and steel, burning coal and cremation (ATSDR).
Mercury's toxic effects result primarily from its targeting of the central nervous system. Populations exposed to low-levels of mercury in drinking water or food (long-term chronic exposure) develop symptoms of Minamata disease, in which symptoms may take up to fifteen years to manifest. The progression of symptoms starts with loss of sensation in the extremities and difficulty performing fine motor tasks. Gradually those exposed will experience difficulty walking and running; these result from lesions in the cerebellum, which is involved in maintaining balance. In order of increasing exposure, problems with sight and hearing develop, followed by convulsions, coma and ultimately death (Rice 1995).
Less extreme exposures are not as debilitating. Some patients may experience tinnitus, or ringing in the ears, and a constriction of the visual field. Children exposed to mercury while in the womb tend have substantially lowered IQs and much higher incidences of mental retardation relative to the general population (Rice 1995).
Burning coal for electric power releases mercury into the air. Mercury may also enter the soil and groundwater when coal is being stored on site. Both of these uses were in place in the Jewelry District of yore. We can expect to find mercury contamination associated with power plants, such as Narragansett Power and Electric. While mercury tends to be fairly immobile in soils, mercury released to the air generally deposits into water, where it is converted by bacteria into an organic form of mercury. This, in turn, bioaccumulates, with mercury levels being highest in large, long-lived, predatory fish (Rice 1995). Because coal-burning power plants are prevalent in the Mid-west and atmospheric circulation patterns bring this air towards the northeast, in particular, New England, we can expect mercury contamination to be widespread throughout Providence (Science Daily). Public health officials are caught between recommending people consume fish for the benefits of omega-3 fatty acids and cautioning people against fish because of mercury contamination.
________________________________________________________________
Remediation
Phase I | Due Diligence | Phase II | Investigation & Remediation
Phase I
In deciding whether to purchase and remediate a brownfield property, developers follow a series of steps. The first of these, called Phase I, is meant as a basic decision-making tool. Buyers try to assess the extent of hazardous contamination on a property using the standards of the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM). The intent is to identify if contamination exists to a degree that could threaten public health or could result in governmental enforcement action.
Potential buyers investigate the site of interest and look for hazardous materials present on the premises, as well as on the adjacent properties. "Recognized environmental conditions" include above- and underground storage tanks, as well as any source of petroleum. As contamination is generally a result of past activities on or near a site, it is important to look into a site's land use history. Buyers, often using environmental consultants, research the history of the site, tracing back to its first developed use or 1940 (whichever is earlier). While many sources can provide information, facility records often serve as one of the best. Additionally, Sanborn maps, originally developed for insurance companies to assess fire hazards, are an important source of this information. Often buyers will try to contact members of the community as well, to ask them about what they know of a site's history. State and federal environmental offices may also have relevant information.
Because the migration of contaminants can pose a risk to human health and the environment, site assessments should also try to gather information in the site's physical characteristics. These include information on a site's topography, soils, sub-surface structures (such as piping) and direction of groundwater flow.
Site visits and interviews are generally also conducted, before writing a report. There are three possible outcomes for phase I assessment: no recognized environmental conditions exist on a site, historical recognized conditions existed but have been remediated, or recognized environmental conditions exist that will need to be further investigated and perhaps remediated as part of the redevelopment of the site..
Phase I site assessment is very much a qualitative, subjective measure. It is not intended to, and cannot really even hope to, estimate the costs of remediation.
Due Diligence
The due diligence process aims to determine the extent of legal risk, as well as the financial viability, of a brownfield remediation project. Essentially, the whole process tries to determine whether a remediation project is feasible.
A market analysis helps determine the end goal of remediation. Development on a property should be targeted towards enabling the property to fit in with an area's other economic activities. This may not be possible if contamination is too severe for a particular zoning classification.
It can be very costly to clean up and develop a site. Ideally, developers would know going into the process what funds they will require. However, conducting a cost analysis is tricky. Phase I data cannot estimate the costs of remediation, though the relative extent of contamination may become clearer. Remediation plans need to take into account the costs of remediation, as well as the costs of purchasing, planning, engineering, environmental and legal consultation and insurance. Because it is so difficult to predict costs, and because there are risks of liability, many lenders and banks are uncomfortable financing brownfields projects. Legislation may help remove banks from the "chain of title." (EPA)
Legal analyses can serve to minimize liability risks associated with developing brownfields. The counsel of environmental attorneys helps developers identify regulatory and permitting requirements, which can be difficult to navigate. Attorneys can also try to provide estimates of time frames and costs.
Phase II
If there are recognized environmental conditions and a prospective buyer or developer remains interested, the next step is called Phase II. This is, in contrast to Phase I, a quantitative evaluation of the contamination. Samples of soil and groundwater are collected and analyzed in labs to measure the levels and extent of contamination on a site. The goal is to determine what exists on a property, where it is located and where it may be moving towards; such investigation focuses on groundwater elevations, flow rates and direction. If circumstances require, surface water and sediment samples may be drawn. If data indicates that contaminants may migrate to the air through soil and a building's foundation, air samples may also taken inside and outside of a building. In the case of 70 Ship Street, contaminants in the soil were found to be migrating inside through cracks in the foundation.
The extent of the sampling is determined by Phase I findings. The period of sampling may be as brief as a day. Samples are drawn with the goal of determining the geographic extent of contamination to the point of being able to identify boundaries.
The data that results is compared to regulatory standards dictated by the states. These may be more protective than EPA guidelines. Many states have screening criteria, which determine when contamination must be reported and dealt with, and cleanup standards, which determine how much cleanup must be done. In Rhode Island, they are the same. If the results of sampling and testing are below the criteria, there is no obligation to report anything to the Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM). If, however, any contaminants are found to exist above the criteria levels, then further investigations and if necessary remediation must be conducted, and a report developed, in accordance with RIDEM's rules and site-specific requirements..
Investigation and Remediation
RIDEM and the Office of Waste Management established a list of regulations for brownfield remediation in 1993, making modifications in 1996 to include risk-based criteria. These serve as the regulatory framework. Chemical releases into the environment are the specific target of the regulations, which establish soil and groundwater limits based on the anticipated use of the property. Institutional controls often involve leaving contamination on site but restricting access or use to minimize threats to health. As school and residential standards are more stringent than those for industrial or commercial use, sites with left contamination will probably be restricted to industrial or commercial development. Additional consideration is given to the potential for off-site impacts; actions are taken to implement "containment technologies" such as caps and liners.
A remediation plan developed for a site by environmental engineers will describe what should be done about contamination. The plan identifies all concerns on a property, discussing specific regions if contamination varies across the site. Recommended management takes into account the implications of contamination; a cost estimate tries to anticipate the costs of implementing and operating technology to reduce the risks of contamination. Stakeholders, such as industry, government, community groups and members, developers and banks, should be addressed in the plan.
After implementing a plan, development can occur. Sometimes periodic monitoring may need to be conducted to ensure that technologies do not fail. As the costs of monitoring may be excessive, these should be addressed in cleanup budgets.
________________________________________________________________
References
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-te.md.arsenic21apr21,0,2861870.story?track=rss
http://www.brown.edu/Administration/News_Bureau/2001-02/01-018.html
http://www.rabnewportri.org/enclosures/July2006Encl7.pdf
http://www.epa.gov/safewater/arsenic/basicinformation.html
http://www.npi.gov.au/database/substance-info/profiles/74.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polycyclic_aromatic_hydrocarbon
http://www.extension.umn.edu/distribution/horticulture/DG2543.html
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts13.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php?feed=Science&article=UPI-1-20070413-15171900-bc-us-mercury.xml
Neurotoxicity of Lead, Methylmercury, and PCBs in Relation to the Great Lakes
Deborah C. Rice, Environmental Health Perspectives 103:71-87 (1995)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_%28element%29
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/phs46.html
http://www.brown.edu/Administration/News_Bureau/2006-07/06-115.html
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts7.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_VI
http://www.brown.edu/Administration/News_Bureau/2006-07/06-115.html
|