Exeter Growth


Residential Growth

Development in Exeter, RI is mostly rural residential. Recently, residential growth has not been significant compared to national or regional rates. However, in order to assess the potential growth allowed by existing zoning regulations, Exeter's Comprehensive Plan of 1994 undertook a residential zoning buildout analysis.

Click on image to enlarge.

The majority of lost open space from 1970 to 1990 was to residential development as 1124 housing units and 2216 people came to Exeter during that time. As outlined by Exeter's 1994 Comprehensive Plan, the dense developments in Cedar Grove, Boone Lake, and areas where mobile homes are concentrated, could potentially have a negative impact on the surrounding natural environment.

As of 1994, Exeter had a total of 21,666 acres of potentially buildable residentially-zoned land. To see how this was divided among the four residential zoning types, click here. Furthermore, for a graphical depiction of Exeter's potential for residential growth, click here. This graph shows the potential development in each type of zoning district per Planning District. As this indicates, a total of 5,508 units could be developed which would result in the increase of 15,508 people. Compared to Exeter's current population, this increase is almost 3-fold and would require major infrastructure development and growth. A summary look at the buildout analysis by zoning district can be seen here.

The greatest potential for growth is in the RU-4 zone bordered by Ten Rod Road to the north and Mail Rd. to the south. The RU-4 zone north of Ten Rod Rd west of the New London TP has the potential for 413 units. Exeter's Comp. Plan noted that the lack of a town center or established village areas can tend to result in scattered growth patterns.

The potential for residential growth is linked in many ways to the protection of Exeter's drinking water sources. For example, the lack of public water and sewer service requires strict development controls with respect to land use densities and the siting of developments. Furthermore, conventional subdivision development does not provide the potential of open space corridors, the preservation of prime farmland, or increased protection for sensitive natural features. (Exeter's Comprehensive Plan 1994)

In response, in 1996 a Growth Management Study for Exeter, RI by Brenda A. Dillman and Jane Weidman, stated, "A cluster ordinance, which allows smaller individual lots...and the permanent protection of common open space, provides an alternative to a uniform grid of houses on large lots consuming all the undeveloped land on the property. The flexibility in siting in a cluster development can provide for the preservation of open space areas within the development site...and also results in a lower overall construction and infrastructure costs" (21). For more information about recommendations to control housing growth in Exeter, click here.

Exeter relies on its residential properties for the majority of its tax base, and its residential property percentage of its tax base (76.84% 1993) is noticeably higher than the state average (68.69% 1993). This is one impact of uncontrolled growth.